Wednesday, December 4, 2019

I Received The Highest Level Of Recognition Ever Granted In The Fluid Power Industry - "The King Of Hydraulics."​

I Received The Highest Level Of Recognition Ever Granted In The Fluid Power Industry - "The King Of Hydraulics."​

Rory McLaren
Status is online

Rory McLaren

Founder/Director/Teacher/Author/Red Seal
I was about to start my workshop last Wednesday morning when one of the students came up to the front of the class. He made a short but very moving speech and handed me a crown. I will wear it with pride!
I conducted my final on-site training workshop for the year with a group of oil-field service mechanics. Of all the industries I work in I expect oil-field workers to have received intensive training in how to work safely with fluids under pressure.
I don't believe there is a single industry that exposes workers to a wider range of pressures than the oil-field service industry. People that work on oil-field service equipment routinely use paint-spray guns, grease guns, hydraulic bolt-torque devices, pressure washers, pneumatic tools, compressed gas cylinders, and port-powers. The pressures in these devices range from 120-PSI (8 bar) to 8000-PSI (552 bar).
When they are testing power ends and other equipment at work and setting up frac jobs they routinely face pressures up to 15000-PSI (1034 bar). When frac machines, blenders, coil tubing machines, nitrogen pumpers, and support equipment are operating workers come face to face with hydraulic pressures up to 5000-PSI (345 bar) and pumping pressures up to 15000-PSI (1034 bar).
All people that operate oil-field service equipment, service, repair and tests oil-field equipment, and all supervisors managers and supervisors, should receive intensive training in all types of pressurized systems.
Most oil-field safety supervisors have some training in hazards related to pressurized fluids. However, as I learned recently, there is a reason to be deeply concerned that some safety personnel only identify the hazard by visualization and do not understand the underlying physics associated with pressurized fluids.
Case in point - The heavy steel pipes that transport fluids from the various service equipment to wells come in sections. They are joined together with threaded flanges. The flanges have a unique way of being tightened. There are usually three ears that are cast into the flange. The ears protrude from the outer diameter of the flange. To tighten a flange the assembler strikes an ear with a hammer. When the pipes are assembled they undergo pressure testing.
It is my understanding that when the testing is complete and the pumping is underway if a flange leaks personnel are forbidden to tighten the flange while there is pressure in the pipe. Tightening a flange while there is pressure in the pipe is recognized by oil-field safety personnel as being so dangerous that any person that is caught doing so is likely to be terminated.
I was recently told by an oil-field service mechanic that a hydraulic fitting on a frac machine was leaking while it was pumping fluids. While the safety supervisor looked on a mechanic tightened the leaking fitting with an impact wrench. This while the pressure in the system hovered around 4,000-PSI.
This incident proved that the only knowledge the site safety supervisor had that tightening a flange while it is under pressure is extremely dangerous is that he or she read it in a book or learned it at a seminar. Ironically, in the three decades, I have been conducting hydraulic safety workshops only one safety supervisor attended the entire workshop.
Over the past three decades, I have done an extensive amount of training in the oil-field. Moreover, I have worked with almost every notable oil-field service company. Whenever I conduct a workshop I begin by asking my students two questions:
  1. Have you ever received training that focuses on safety with ALL pressurized systems?
  2. Have you ever attended a course in fundamental hydraulics?
Oil-field safety supervisors and managers should be alarmed with the fact that over 99% of the students say they have never received focused training in pressurized systems. Moreover, over 85% have never received formal training in hydraulics. Ironically, all of the respondents perform service and repair work on pressurized systems.
I conducted my final on-site training workshop for the one oil-field service company that never gives up on hydraulic safety training - Calfrac. I have had the pleasure of conducting Calfrac's hydraulic safety training for eight years. It's obvious that Calfrac's management team takes its safety mission very seriously.
We shipped four of our flagship Model MF102D-TSE hydraulic training simulators and a Model MF200-CAV cavitation training simulator to Calfrac's training centre in San Antonio, Texas.
No alt text provided for this image

Model MF200-CAV
Here are the student's responses to last week's post-workshop survey:
  • By what percentage did the workshop improve your knowledge of hydraulic safety?
The workshop improved 91% of the students' knowledge of hydraulic safety by 100%. Two other students reported improvements of 150% and 900%.
  • Based on what you learned from the workshop have you ever put yourself or others in harm's way because of your lack of knowledge about hydraulics.
The answers revealed that 91% of the students had put their lives or the lives of others at risk.
  • Based on the knowledge you gained from this workshop have you ever removed hydraulic components that were not defective?
91% of the students revealed they had replaced hydraulic components that were not defective. One student opined that he removed components that were in good working condition 90% of the time.
General Comments-
"I had no clue about working safely with hydraulics prior to the class."
"I will stop the practice of bleeding lines and loosening fittings."
"Will not do the things I did before. Will be safer." 
"Instructors passion and expertise in hydraulic safety is phenomenal."
"I learned that I should be more cautious when removing hydraulic lines."
Takeaway-
The aim of my articles is to emphasize the state of safety in the fluid power industry. As you can see from the numerous surveys I have conducted hydraulic safety is sorely lacking in all corners of the industry.
Bear in mind the answers would be no different if I held a workshop in almost any company in America.
Escaping pressurized fluids whether by design (paint gun) or due to a leak in a hydraulic system represent a major hazard that has caused workers to suffer serious and fatal injuries.
I am about to publish a new book titled "Working Safely With Fluids Under Pressure." It is a MUST READ for safety personnel, supervisors, all people that operate machines, which employ fluid power, and especially people that perform service and repair work on fluid power systems. The book is also aimed at people that are at the highest risk of suffering debilitating fluid injection injuries - painters, lubricators/oilers, high-pressure washers, injection moulding, water jets, etc.
On behalf of FPTI, I wish you all a safe and happy Thanksgiving. While being thankful for what we have let's give thought to the families that will have a vacant seat at the Thanksgiving table because a loved one never returned home from work.
Thanks also to all the men and women around the world that keep us safe and well - soldiers, law enforcement officers, firefighters, EMT's, security guards, crossing guards, airport security, nurses and doctors.

MicroLeak Is The Safest, Quickest And Most Time Efficient Technique For Testing Hydraulic Components On The Planet

MicroLeak Is The Safest, Quickest And Most Time Efficient Technique For Testing Hydraulic Components On The Planet 

Rory McLaren
Status is online

Rory McLaren

Founder/Director/Teacher/Author/Red Seal
If anyone tells you that you can test pressure control valves, directional control valves, check valves and hydraulic cylinders with conventional flowmeters - not!
Here are a few reasons why it's not practical to use conventional flowmeters to test the volumetric efficiency of most hydraulic components:
  1. Mechanics are the last thing on a design engineer's mind when he or she designs a hydraulic system. Consequently, it's difficult or impossible to install flow meters in most hydraulic systems.
  2. The amount of leakage that causes hydraulic cylinders to drift, and or contributes to excessive oil temperature and poor actuator response cannot be measured with conventional flow meters.
  3. Flow meters are cumbersome and difficult to install in most hydraulic systems. Installation requires too many specialized fittings.
  4. Many flow meters are in and of themselves extremely hazardous. You will find people using ball valves as load cells, which presents a considerable safety hazard. In fact, hydraulic simulator manufacturer Amatrol sells these lethal devices to America's technical colleges where students risk their lives using them.
  5. Uninformed people will purchase a non-reverse flow capable flow-meter, which can present a considerable safety hazard.
  6. Production supervisors and managers aren't going to sit around and twiddle their thumbs while mechanics spend hours looking for fittings, making hose assemblies and toiling while they try desperately to install flow meters at various locations in hydraulic systems.
Three decades ago I decided to develop a diagnostic system that all but eliminates the use of flow meters. It took me ten years to develop the technology and write the necessary instruction manuals and textbooks. Of course, safety was the driving force behind the development and implementation of the technology.
Photo below of MicroLeak test kit with Komatsu and Caterpillar adaptors. The adaptors are specifically designed for MicroLeak testing. An important safety note. I do not drill and tap JIC 37ยบ caps. I design and build caps with adequate thickness to accommodate a threaded fitting safely.
Note - Komatsu and Caterpillar do not endorse MicroLeak testing. 
No alt text provided for this image
In short, the first thing I had to do was to learn the normal leakage rates of all hydraulic components. Then, I had to learn the terminal leakage rates of all hydraulic components. By this I mean I had to figure out the level of leakage that would render a hydraulic component useless. Next, I had to develop a hand pump that would deliver a very specific amount of flow. Finally, I had to design the special connectors needed to perform the tests.
I decided to call the technique "microleak" testing because let's face it, the amount of leakage in pressure control valves, directional control valves, check valves, and hydraulic cylinders is almost immeasurable.
There is no doubt that MicroLeak testing revolutionized component testing. The technique makes it possible to test 98% of hydraulic components in any hydraulic system with the power source safely locked out, which makes it the safest technique available for testing hydraulic components. Another highly desirable safety feature is that the process is almost non-invasive. Also, there is no need to remove the suspect component from the system. It makes production supervisors salivate - the duration of tests averages 15-minutes.
I have tried in vain to introduce this amazing technology to America's technical colleges. Regrettably, very few takers. A handful of instructors teach their students this revolutionary technology. 
I can understand why machinery and equipment manufacturers don't like MicroLeak testing. Try to imagine how much the industry's profits would plummet if the hydraulic troubleshooting error rate (HTER) in America dropped from 85% to less than 1%.
If you want to become proficient at MicroLeak testing, I can recommend a handful of colleges across the country that can teach you. On the other hand, you can attend my hands-on workshop. A word of advice - you must have completed a course in basic hydraulic before attending my workshop. Also, teachers that work at tax-payer funded schools and colleges can attend my workshop free of charge (workshop fee only).
No alt text provided for this image
Here is a link to the MicroLeak test kit - https://www.hydracheck.com/catalog/diagnostic-test-kits/pressureleak-test-kit-2/
You can see all the test kits I design and build at www.hydracheck.com

If You See It You Will Never Forget It.

If You See It You Will Never Forget It.

Rory McLaren
Status is online

Rory McLaren

Founder/Director/Teacher/Author/Red Seal
There are many reasons why I enjoy unprecedented success in my work teaching hydraulics. First, let me explain my definition of success. I base the success of my workshops on two criteria - how much the workshop improves a student's knowledge of hydraulic safety, and how competent a student is to perform maintenance and troubleshooting.
Over 85% (conservative estimate) of the students that graduate from America's technical colleges don't know much about hydraulic safety; they cannot perform turnkey proactive maintenance, and their knowledge of hydraulic troubleshooting is pitiful. In fact, many students are taught troubleshooting procedures that can cause them to be injured or killed.
I find it interesting that most technical colleges believe that all they need to nurture competent hydraulic technicians is a low bid simulator and an instructor that has tenure with a global manufacturer. I have learned that mechanics that work for machinery and equipment manufacturers by and large have poor troubleshooting skills. Bear in mind that selling hydraulic components is the primary objective of machinery and equipment manufacturers. Consequently, why will it be their primary objective to employ highly competent hydraulic technicians?
Now let's talk about what it takes to nurture competent technicians. Take cavitation for example. For ten years I analysed hydraulic component failures. With respect to my study of hydraulic pump failures, I found that over 75% of open-loop pumps had evidence of cavitation, or cavitation had caused their demise. Ironically, a pump's inlet is one of the most overlooked operating parameters in over 99% of hydraulic systems.
One doesn't have to look too far for evidence. Over 99% of hydraulic systems design engineers have never checked the inlet restriction of hydraulic pumps; over 99% of technicians don't know a pump's inlet restriction point-of-reference (POR), and over 99% of hydraulic pumps are designed in such a manner that it's almost impossible to check a pump's inlet restriction. Many hydraulic systems are shipped out with inlet problems. Of course, if a pump fails the system's owner will get blamed for the failure.
Students that are new to hydraulics usually have no idea what pump cavitation is. If you ask a room full of mechanics what cavitation is, about half will say its "oil starvation" and the other half will say it's "aeration."
Most mechanics believe that one of the primary causes of pump cavitation is a low oil level in the reservoir. A low oil level will allow air to enter a hydraulic pump. Since air contamination of oil has nothing to do with a liquids vapour pressure or the dissolved air in liquid aeration is referred to as "pseudo-cavitation."
An instructor can toil for hours trying to get students to understand the difference between cavitation and pseudo-cavitation, or like me, he or she can put the students in front of the Model MF200-CAV Cavitation Training Simulator and in less than an hour students will know everything they need to know about the operation at the inlet side of a pump, and the cause and effect of cavitation and pseudo-cavitation.
The MF200 Pump Cavitation Training Simulator is unique in that almost the entire hydraulic system is transparent.
No alt text provided for this image
It has a transparent reservoir, transparent pump intake and transparent discharge. Each student is given a comprehensive workbook. Students are asked to answer questions about each step.
The training involves four steps:
Step 1 - How to perform a pump start-up
When the simulator is turned on, the students document the systems operating parameters, which includes pump flow, ambient temperature, oil temperature, oil pressure, and most importantly, pump inlet restriction. This is one of the most critical steps when starting a pump in a new application. During pump start-up, an engineers responsibility is to determine if the pump's inlet restriction lies well within the parameters set forth by the respective pump manufacturer and to determine the pump's inlet restriction point-of-reference (POR).
Step 2 - Pump Cavitation - cause and effect
Cavitation by definition is the "formation and collapse of gaseous cavities within a liquid." Hydraulic oil is made up of 10% dissolved air by volume. Up to and during cavitation the dissolved air comes out of the oil. When the gaseous cavity is exposed to pressure at the pumps discharge port, it "implodes."
Cavitation at the pump's inlet can be clearly seen in the photo below:
No alt text provided for this image
The instructor slowly closes a valve at the pump's inlet and pump inlet. Students watch as the pump inlet restriction gradually rises and reaches a point where they see the dissolved air comes out of the oil. An important component of this demonstration is that students can see how the smallest amount of cavitation reduces pump flow and oil pressure. Less than 1% of mechanics use a vacuum gauge when flow testing hydraulic pumps.
This step also lets students see that once the implosion occurs in the pump there is no evidence of turbulence in the pump's discharge port or in the reservoir.
Step 2 - Pseudo-cavitation - cause and effect
A micro-valve at the pump's inlet port is opened allowing an extremely small amount of air to stream into the pump's intake.
Photo of aerated oil as a result of an air-leak at the pump's inlet-
No alt text provided for this image
Students learn very quickly that lower is not better when it comes to a pump's inlet restriction. Inlet restriction decreases and the oil in the reservoir immediately begins to look as though it's boiling. Once again students get to witness how pseudo-cavitation reduces pump flow and oil pressure.
Step 3 - Return flow discharging above the oil level in the reservoir
The instructor opens a valve and the oil begins to drain out of the reservoir. It reaches a point where the oil return line rises above the oil level (photo below).
No alt text provided for this image
Students witness how the oil creates turbulence that aerates the oil. Oftentimes mechanics see foam in a hydraulic reservoirs' sight glass. While they search for an air leak at the pump's inlet, they don't realize its due to either poor design or low oil level.
Step 4 - Vortex
As the oil level encroaches on the pump's inlet the students witness a vortex (photo below).
No alt text provided for this image
A vortex occurs when the oil level encroaches on a pump's inlet below the oil level. Oftentimes the problem is inherent because designers overlook how much of the volume of the reservoir is consumed by double-acting single rod cylinders, telescoping cylinders and hydro-pneumatic accumulators.
The comprehensive student workbook contains causes of both cavitation and pseudo-cavitation.
I give the lion's share of the success I enjoy teaching hydraulics to the simulators, textbooks, and animations I develop. I consider the fact that mechanics are folks with a God-given gift to fix things. The worst thing many instructors do is put a bunch of equations on a whiteboard. Why is it important for mechanics to know the mathematics behind how fast a hydraulic cylinder rod travels? All they need to know is how a cylinder works, and what to do if it stops working. Keeping it simple keeps them interested. 
Want to enjoy the success I enjoy with teaching hydraulics? No problem! Simply use the same world-class simulators I use. The Model MF200-CAV Cavitation Training System comes with PowerPoint slides, animations, and comprehensive student workbooks.
No alt text provided for this image
Here is a link to the MF200-CAV
https://www.fpti.org/simulators_hydraulic_MF200.php